I had to stop myself from Yeah, buting the blind selection bit, since that's not your point. Your point is about steel manning and biases and I agree. Also null results aren't interesting. "Jury looked at the evidence and made the correct decision" is boring. Well researched as it may be, the Jury spent longer going over the evidence than the journalists and certainly longer than I did on podcasts, youtubes and articles. Gut still tells me they got this wrong.
I had to stop myself from Yeah, buting the blind selection bit, since that's not your point. Your point is about steel manning and biases and I agree. Also null results aren't interesting. "Jury looked at the evidence and made the correct decision" is boring. Well researched as it may be, the Jury spent longer going over the evidence than the journalists and certainly longer than I did on podcasts, youtubes and articles. Gut still tells me they got this wrong.